Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Joyce's avatar

Natural vs. Artificial is targeted distinction but since the “ars” “facio” is a human product and we are natural may I suggest a distinction without a difference? What is the financial benefit from deriving knowledge from a comprehensive summarized distillation of recorded thinking, hopefully true, on selected subjects? It is the reuse of human thought without compensation to the thinker. Replacing original source research for “classic comics” denigrates the result in my opinion.

Expand full comment
Wendy kiwus's avatar

Yes, its impressive and scary as hell.I believe this is already being done with video of " people" talking. I hesitate to state what made me recognize this talking " person" image as fake. Because of course they would improve it and why make it that much easier!!?? Seemed to be a test of some sort.

It was "forecasting" weather- harmless, heh??

We are all likely to be duped- just like those "grandchildren" scams, calling because they need money wired. THIS is on steroids.

I'm afraid, This goes beyond being able to think critically. I also agree VERY manipulative to personify. GOD help us-

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts