If the judge refuses to listen to the facts, nor admit the details of fraud, or look at the graphs that show the anomalies, he obviously understands the truth. His only course of action must be to bury his head in the sand and hope no rational human is watching this debacle.
This is going to appeal because the truth must be found. This co…
If the judge refuses to listen to the facts, nor admit the details of fraud, or look at the graphs that show the anomalies, he obviously understands the truth. His only course of action must be to bury his head in the sand and hope no rational human is watching this debacle.
This is going to appeal because the truth must be found. This court is merely standing in the way of justice. That is all they have to offer.
If the judge refuses to listen to the facts, nor admit the details of fraud, or look at the graphs that show the anomalies, he obviously understands the truth. His only course of action must be to bury his head in the sand and hope no rational human is watching this debacle.
This is going to appeal because the truth must be found. This court is merely standing in the way of justice. That is all they have to offer.
Regretfully that might be the case. (FYI, if I'm still allowed to make such an observation, the judge here appears to be a woman.)