Democrats steal another one in Wisconsin! Half way thru the morning Milwaukee Central Count ‘discovered’ that although the vote tabulators were sealed, they were not locked! So 40,000 votes had to be retabulated, setting up Milwaukee to be the last to report. In the $200 million dollar Balwin/Hovde senate race, Balwin gets miracle 200% last-day turnout in the rain, miracle 90% of the votes. And they come in at 4AM.
This follows the 2020 Seven-Way Big Steal. Wisconsin passed three constitutional amendments in two years to keep Democrats from cheating. No Zuckerbucks, no to Democrats inflitrating vote counting and no non-citizens voting. And drop boxes, ballot harvesting and ballot curing were ruled illegal. I personally know people who received mulitple ballots in the mail, only useful for cheating
It is very difficult to election fraud. I watched the 2020 election results and saw on major networks evidence of suspicious activities. I watched in Michigan early that night a person questioned the count in a particular region of a count that strongly had one party leading. A person said "That looks wrong. It should be the other way." and contacted an election official. A few minutes later the count for that region was 100% reversed! Why does anyone have the power to change the status?
Another Michigan observation: The people counting the balots complained that the poll watchers were standing to close. The poll watchers said: "we must be this close to see that the person counting is doing it correctly. This was resolved by ordering the poll watchers moved to the back of the large semicircular room.
At this time Trump was leading by over 100,000 votes. A lead that had grown steadly since the start of the counting. Then we had the "pause" where all counting reporting was stopped. The poll watchers were moved out of the room. So they were further away from the vote counters. But wait, the semicular walls had large windows, so the watchers could observe the activity inside the counting room. Michigan officials told the watchers to move away and installed cardboard to cover the windows. In the first count after the pause, Biden was now leading by over 100,000 votes. Why was this counting allowed to procede without watchers?
Moving on to Pennsylvania: There was also a pause here at about the same time as Michigans. The media reported that a truck driver was asked to pick up a trailer with ballots in in Beth Page New York and deliver them to Harrisburg, PA When he got them to Harrisburg, he was told to drop the trailer off at a warehouse in Lancaster, Pa., which he did. He talked about this being his favorite trailer because" it towed so nicely". A few hours this report was reported wrong after the driver was questioned by"'officials". As in Michigan the comfortable trump lead of 100,000 plus votes was now a Biden lead of over 100,000 votes.
Now onto Georgia: Early on Trump was leading by over 100,000 votes. Then came the pause, and everyone was escorted out of the counting room as shown by the cameras located there. This time the reason was a water leak. But they left one of the cameras on and it continued to broadcast the happenings in the counting room. There were still two people in the room. There were one or two large tables in the room covered by a large top to floor coveing. The broadcast showed a person slide
over a large box to a counting station and proceeded to insert papers about the size of ballots into the machine. This was shown for about 10-15 minutes before being terminated. When the broadcast was restored, Biden was now leading by over 100,000 votes.
I am told there were other pauses in the vote counting in other states, but i was not a wittiness to that.
The bottom line: unusual 1-2 hour long pauses in at least three swing states, with other suspicious ativities going on, and in each case Biden took over the lead from trump by more than 100,000 votes and continued to lead until the end.
Recent pertinent information: Triggered by a liberal commentator who said "where did over 10 million liberal votes go?"
prior election results Democrats Replublican
2016 65,853,514 62,904,514
2020 81,283,501 74,223,975
2024 72,855,167 75,869,005
I say to the commentator: "They were never there!"
Any leader of a nation that doesn't question this difference wouldn't be fulfilling his responsibility
Mary: yes there were many suspicious things that happened in 2020. That's why many thousands of hours were subsequently spent by volunteers to plug some of the loopholes. That is also why it is important to have the federal government set certain standards that all states must comply with.
1. There must be a physical record of completed voting to avoid multiple voting by the same individual. The old indelible ink stain on the thumb is a certain proof to prevent duplicate voting.
2. A linked database must be available to identify names and addresses of voters who have already cast their votes. Stolen identity votes must be investigated to enable delayed voting for innocent voters whose vote was falsely used by imposters.
3. Election monitors must be registered by a neutral Federal registrar (not a state registrar) and there must be as many GOP monitors as DNC monitors.
4. Voters must reside within the electorate and state that they vote in with no exception except for certified absentee ballots.
When the Constitution speaks to 1 day for voting, why are you promoting early voting? There is wisdom in voting on 1 day and requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and to vote - with government ID. No machines. Hand count. It's been shown in other countries that a vote total for a nation can be completed in less than 12 hours.
Justin: I agree that there is merit to strict election rules. That said, we were trying to come up with a compromise set of regulations, hoping that those would substantially increase the chances of getting some meaningful federal legislation passed. We didn't think that being flexible on this issue would materially compromise election integrity.
Thanks for a very comprehensive list to secure Election Integrity.
The Vote-by-Mail must be eliminated for sure. Other countries have eliminated vote-by-mail because of fraud.. Electronic ballot counting devices must be outlawed, too. They were set by their Democratic manufacturers to weed out Republican votes. George Soros was in this enterprises, too. Then, in 2020 I read Paul Pelosi (Nancy's spouse) had a big financial interest in ballot counting devices.
After this election, arguments for changing the electoral college allocations deserve more consideration. States, not the Constitution, have been primarily (all except two States) assigning their House (Congressional District) electoral votes to a Winner Take All (WTA) sum of allocations. The large states have chosen WTA because it makes the entire State more important, more powerful, during the battles of election campaigns. That is, the large state as a “swing state” has its desires catered to by both Parties. However, it also discourages Third Party formations and makes the two Parties continually more aggressive against each other.
A Third Party can hardly expect to establish a foothold since it will be impossible to gather enough votes to win an entire state. Although they occupy the dominant middle ground “Independent” voters are not a Party, but a vast group asking for better choices than the increasing extremism enforced upon them by the two warring Parties. A dissolution of the WTA system and the adoption of one electoral vote for each CD will encourage third parties to establish Wins in CDs that may allow them to continue in existence from year to year. Swing CDs will not produce the same focusing of money as for swing states. The barriers are high for a third party to win in a CD with 300,000 voters, but such Wins justify their existence. Small states still receive the bonus intended by the Constitution because two electoral votes are given to the winner of the State count. The final results come out very close to that for a National Popular Vote, whose count of one for every vote is rife with unpleasant possibilities.
Finally, the vast percentage of donation dollars for WTA - most of which are unashamedly from out-of-state sources - increase the dollars spent per vote from something less than $100 per vote to an overwhelming several hundred dollars per vote in a swing state. This author suggests that all out-of-state contributions be taxed at a 50% level, with that money assigned to the reduction of existing national debt.
William T. Lynch PhD,
Raleigh, NC
{Dr. Lynch is a retired Department Head from Bell Labs, and has been examining national and state voting for many decades.}
It would seem to me that America cannot actually move ahead with election integrity if we fail to expose precisely what happened in November 2020. Almost none of the election theft in multiply states has ever been proven. One side says that proves there was no irregularity and the election was just fine. The other side says Trump and other Republicans actually won but their offices were stolen from them with cheating.
I have to believe we have intelligence agents who absolutely know what happened and how it happened. I have seen numerous well prepared reports showing the data to prove there was much election fraud, but the media has not reported it. So, is there a cover-up continuing or were the well written reports false?
To me, the fact that I have to rely on my opinion based on my study of the available information is ridiculous! How can anyone be left is such a crazy situation? The truth is out here and should be given to the public. We can deal with the truth, no matter what it might be. Then we can fix any problems we find.
Jim: What you say makes sense. However, you are expecting that the guilty parties will come forward and admit their guilt — which (in some cases) will subject them to criminal penalties. That is unlikely to happen.
Not likely, I agree. But what I am expecting is honest, non-criminal actors to spill the beans of which they are aware. Many have been silent, I believe, out of fear of retaliation. If so, the retaliation will soon become their protection because any retaliation will be more proof of the fraud the bad guys are covering up. Or, is there nothing to cover-up in the first place? Do you see the problem?
Point 15: Is it wise to report early results? Might it cause people not to vote, or sway the election?
Point 17: There is no fixing deficient ballots. They should be discarded.
Point 21: What is a negative vote tabulation? If more people vote than are registered, that must be illegal.
Point 22: If elligible citizens are automatically registered and some do not ever intend to vote, would not that be an invite for fraud like dead people on the roles who's votes are stolen by others?
Point 24: It MUST be totally illegal for non-citizens to vote. Period. Consequences must be enforsed--deportation!
Point 27: Citizen lawsuits can go both ways and might produce endless frivolous lawfare.
Point 28: Voting machines MUST be eliminated.
Point 30: Why report on foreign voting rules? We are a Sovereign nation. Europe isn't doing to well...
Democrats steal another one in Wisconsin! Half way thru the morning Milwaukee Central Count ‘discovered’ that although the vote tabulators were sealed, they were not locked! So 40,000 votes had to be retabulated, setting up Milwaukee to be the last to report. In the $200 million dollar Balwin/Hovde senate race, Balwin gets miracle 200% last-day turnout in the rain, miracle 90% of the votes. And they come in at 4AM.
This follows the 2020 Seven-Way Big Steal. Wisconsin passed three constitutional amendments in two years to keep Democrats from cheating. No Zuckerbucks, no to Democrats inflitrating vote counting and no non-citizens voting. And drop boxes, ballot harvesting and ballot curing were ruled illegal. I personally know people who received mulitple ballots in the mail, only useful for cheating
Chris: That certainly seems highly suspicious.
It is very difficult to election fraud. I watched the 2020 election results and saw on major networks evidence of suspicious activities. I watched in Michigan early that night a person questioned the count in a particular region of a count that strongly had one party leading. A person said "That looks wrong. It should be the other way." and contacted an election official. A few minutes later the count for that region was 100% reversed! Why does anyone have the power to change the status?
Another Michigan observation: The people counting the balots complained that the poll watchers were standing to close. The poll watchers said: "we must be this close to see that the person counting is doing it correctly. This was resolved by ordering the poll watchers moved to the back of the large semicircular room.
At this time Trump was leading by over 100,000 votes. A lead that had grown steadly since the start of the counting. Then we had the "pause" where all counting reporting was stopped. The poll watchers were moved out of the room. So they were further away from the vote counters. But wait, the semicular walls had large windows, so the watchers could observe the activity inside the counting room. Michigan officials told the watchers to move away and installed cardboard to cover the windows. In the first count after the pause, Biden was now leading by over 100,000 votes. Why was this counting allowed to procede without watchers?
Moving on to Pennsylvania: There was also a pause here at about the same time as Michigans. The media reported that a truck driver was asked to pick up a trailer with ballots in in Beth Page New York and deliver them to Harrisburg, PA When he got them to Harrisburg, he was told to drop the trailer off at a warehouse in Lancaster, Pa., which he did. He talked about this being his favorite trailer because" it towed so nicely". A few hours this report was reported wrong after the driver was questioned by"'officials". As in Michigan the comfortable trump lead of 100,000 plus votes was now a Biden lead of over 100,000 votes.
Now onto Georgia: Early on Trump was leading by over 100,000 votes. Then came the pause, and everyone was escorted out of the counting room as shown by the cameras located there. This time the reason was a water leak. But they left one of the cameras on and it continued to broadcast the happenings in the counting room. There were still two people in the room. There were one or two large tables in the room covered by a large top to floor coveing. The broadcast showed a person slide
over a large box to a counting station and proceeded to insert papers about the size of ballots into the machine. This was shown for about 10-15 minutes before being terminated. When the broadcast was restored, Biden was now leading by over 100,000 votes.
I am told there were other pauses in the vote counting in other states, but i was not a wittiness to that.
The bottom line: unusual 1-2 hour long pauses in at least three swing states, with other suspicious ativities going on, and in each case Biden took over the lead from trump by more than 100,000 votes and continued to lead until the end.
Recent pertinent information: Triggered by a liberal commentator who said "where did over 10 million liberal votes go?"
prior election results Democrats Replublican
2016 65,853,514 62,904,514
2020 81,283,501 74,223,975
2024 72,855,167 75,869,005
I say to the commentator: "They were never there!"
Any leader of a nation that doesn't question this difference wouldn't be fulfilling his responsibility
Mary: yes there were many suspicious things that happened in 2020. That's why many thousands of hours were subsequently spent by volunteers to plug some of the loopholes. That is also why it is important to have the federal government set certain standards that all states must comply with.
Further suggestions:
1. There must be a physical record of completed voting to avoid multiple voting by the same individual. The old indelible ink stain on the thumb is a certain proof to prevent duplicate voting.
2. A linked database must be available to identify names and addresses of voters who have already cast their votes. Stolen identity votes must be investigated to enable delayed voting for innocent voters whose vote was falsely used by imposters.
3. Election monitors must be registered by a neutral Federal registrar (not a state registrar) and there must be as many GOP monitors as DNC monitors.
4. Voters must reside within the electorate and state that they vote in with no exception except for certified absentee ballots.
When the Constitution speaks to 1 day for voting, why are you promoting early voting? There is wisdom in voting on 1 day and requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and to vote - with government ID. No machines. Hand count. It's been shown in other countries that a vote total for a nation can be completed in less than 12 hours.
Justin: I agree that there is merit to strict election rules. That said, we were trying to come up with a compromise set of regulations, hoping that those would substantially increase the chances of getting some meaningful federal legislation passed. We didn't think that being flexible on this issue would materially compromise election integrity.
Thanks for a very comprehensive list to secure Election Integrity.
The Vote-by-Mail must be eliminated for sure. Other countries have eliminated vote-by-mail because of fraud.. Electronic ballot counting devices must be outlawed, too. They were set by their Democratic manufacturers to weed out Republican votes. George Soros was in this enterprises, too. Then, in 2020 I read Paul Pelosi (Nancy's spouse) had a big financial interest in ballot counting devices.
My suggestion is:
Can the Electoral College Be Improved?
After this election, arguments for changing the electoral college allocations deserve more consideration. States, not the Constitution, have been primarily (all except two States) assigning their House (Congressional District) electoral votes to a Winner Take All (WTA) sum of allocations. The large states have chosen WTA because it makes the entire State more important, more powerful, during the battles of election campaigns. That is, the large state as a “swing state” has its desires catered to by both Parties. However, it also discourages Third Party formations and makes the two Parties continually more aggressive against each other.
A Third Party can hardly expect to establish a foothold since it will be impossible to gather enough votes to win an entire state. Although they occupy the dominant middle ground “Independent” voters are not a Party, but a vast group asking for better choices than the increasing extremism enforced upon them by the two warring Parties. A dissolution of the WTA system and the adoption of one electoral vote for each CD will encourage third parties to establish Wins in CDs that may allow them to continue in existence from year to year. Swing CDs will not produce the same focusing of money as for swing states. The barriers are high for a third party to win in a CD with 300,000 voters, but such Wins justify their existence. Small states still receive the bonus intended by the Constitution because two electoral votes are given to the winner of the State count. The final results come out very close to that for a National Popular Vote, whose count of one for every vote is rife with unpleasant possibilities.
Finally, the vast percentage of donation dollars for WTA - most of which are unashamedly from out-of-state sources - increase the dollars spent per vote from something less than $100 per vote to an overwhelming several hundred dollars per vote in a swing state. This author suggests that all out-of-state contributions be taxed at a 50% level, with that money assigned to the reduction of existing national debt.
William T. Lynch PhD,
Raleigh, NC
{Dr. Lynch is a retired Department Head from Bell Labs, and has been examining national and state voting for many decades.}
It would seem to me that America cannot actually move ahead with election integrity if we fail to expose precisely what happened in November 2020. Almost none of the election theft in multiply states has ever been proven. One side says that proves there was no irregularity and the election was just fine. The other side says Trump and other Republicans actually won but their offices were stolen from them with cheating.
I have to believe we have intelligence agents who absolutely know what happened and how it happened. I have seen numerous well prepared reports showing the data to prove there was much election fraud, but the media has not reported it. So, is there a cover-up continuing or were the well written reports false?
To me, the fact that I have to rely on my opinion based on my study of the available information is ridiculous! How can anyone be left is such a crazy situation? The truth is out here and should be given to the public. We can deal with the truth, no matter what it might be. Then we can fix any problems we find.
Jim: What you say makes sense. However, you are expecting that the guilty parties will come forward and admit their guilt — which (in some cases) will subject them to criminal penalties. That is unlikely to happen.
Not likely, I agree. But what I am expecting is honest, non-criminal actors to spill the beans of which they are aware. Many have been silent, I believe, out of fear of retaliation. If so, the retaliation will soon become their protection because any retaliation will be more proof of the fraud the bad guys are covering up. Or, is there nothing to cover-up in the first place? Do you see the problem?
Jim: Yes
Thank you for making us think!:)
On Point 11: Should be a legal picture ID.
Point 15: Is it wise to report early results? Might it cause people not to vote, or sway the election?
Point 17: There is no fixing deficient ballots. They should be discarded.
Point 21: What is a negative vote tabulation? If more people vote than are registered, that must be illegal.
Point 22: If elligible citizens are automatically registered and some do not ever intend to vote, would not that be an invite for fraud like dead people on the roles who's votes are stolen by others?
Point 24: It MUST be totally illegal for non-citizens to vote. Period. Consequences must be enforsed--deportation!
Point 27: Citizen lawsuits can go both ways and might produce endless frivolous lawfare.
Point 28: Voting machines MUST be eliminated.
Point 30: Why report on foreign voting rules? We are a Sovereign nation. Europe isn't doing to well...
Trump should establish an election integrity czar.
Ray: Yes, or an Election Integrity Department.