John, your commentary is spot on, as usual. I see no real progress in fixing the election integrity problem, particularly with the Democrats’ opposition to voter ID. They know the courts are their friend in the event of legal challenges as was so clearly demonstrated in the aftermath of the 2020 election. They can get away with pretty much anything and not be held accountable. Like you, I fear the coming cataclysm. If Trump is able to overcome Democrat cheating and be declared the winner, the Left will rise up in a repeat of the George Floyd riots. If Kamala is the winner, we’re all toast, and we might as well resign ourselves to one-party rule and the loss of the republic.
A suitable addition to your critical thinking list for the upcoming elections is:
Dollars spent, per likely voter, by each party for races that either think are critical.
It is a frighteningly high value. One result is that most of the money is being spent, by far, in the swing states.
I also noticed that in one PAC list that all the candidates were receiving MUCH MORE money from out-of-state donors than from the actual voters in that state. I consider that to be a failure of our democratic system. We already provide equal weight to each voter, no matter the voter’s substantive knowledge, but we now have overwhelming weight being given to out-of-state non-voters/contributors.
I also have tried, but failed, to find out the set of sources that the federal government considers when it comes up with the numbers of dollars that it considers have been spent (or in holding) by each candidate. Can you address that? (For example, can it be claimed that the sum of any gifts from any Party that exceeds $100 is akin to an offered bribe? I personally don’t think so, but SOMETHING needs to be done. As another example, could any sums coming in from outside the State to within-State media require an equal allotment of that sum to the major opponent? That would really stop the faucet.)
I have written up some of this in the past, but I seem to get nothing by the reviewing editors.
You provide a great service, one that is appreciated.
Your post on upcoming 2024 is a good inventory of our situation. Our situation took decades to create, and it is the fault of we likeminded citizens NOT PAYING ATTENTION over these decades thinking everything would be OK…not paying attention to schools indoctrinating instead of educating, not paying attention to our government representative’s actual performance, etc., etc. The most recent situation needs to be laid at the feet of the current leadership over the last four years. If we want to change the situation, we have to change the leadership.
John…you and I have disagreed on how to change the leadership…thru fair elections (your stance) vs. get out the vote (my stance). Obviously, both are needed but my position over the last year has been that we’re not going to get fair elections in time for the election…your post seems to concede this point. My wife and I have teamed up with TurningPoint Action to construct a free TeamMichigan App that is Michigan centric. It has over 275,000 names, addresses and phone numbers of likeminded voters across Michigan who rarely vote. We’ve put together hundreds of volunteers across Michigan to download the free App and knock on doors, make calls, send texts or send letters to urge theses disengaged voters to pay attention and change the current situation the old fashioned way…by voting…in the face of widespread cheating. Many states have experienced cheating and only lost by fairly narrow margins. Our strategy is to overwhelm the cheating by getting likeminded non-voters to vote. In 2020, over 1.3 million of these voters did not vote.
Respectfully, we have under 30 days to make an important decision if we want to change the situation or if we want to continue the situation…this decision is in our hands.
Gary: TY for your support...The article you cite seems to list multiple issues — so not sure what issue you are referring to. My overall comment on the article is that it is somewhat over-the-top.
I'm glad Gary posted that link. I was going to post an earlier article but they present the same issue. And yes, Jay does tend to be both passionate about his dislike of the election integrity firms and proud of the work his team has accomplished.
But his software is real and does what he claims. In the following 3 min video, Jay does a walk-thru of a small sample of the bad entries in Texas' voter rolls:
Yes it is over-the-top, but because addressing the issue it explains is the best way we have to make this election reflect the true choice of LEGAL votes and is not getting proper attention, I think it is needed.
There is really one issue, which is that there is evidence that as many absentee ballots as necessary to swing this election can be voted by other than the actual voter they will be sent to. Because the addresses they will be sent to are not deliverable to the actual voter. All the discussion is to emphasize and explain and give examples.
I hope you see how important this issue is and amplify it on your platform. Thanks for your reply.
Excellent report. A great overview of the communist Democrat election machine.
John: TY. I haven't seen anyone else cover all these bases...
Your article does an excellent compare and contrast, with where America is in Bible prophecy🙏
John, your commentary is spot on, as usual. I see no real progress in fixing the election integrity problem, particularly with the Democrats’ opposition to voter ID. They know the courts are their friend in the event of legal challenges as was so clearly demonstrated in the aftermath of the 2020 election. They can get away with pretty much anything and not be held accountable. Like you, I fear the coming cataclysm. If Trump is able to overcome Democrat cheating and be declared the winner, the Left will rise up in a repeat of the George Floyd riots. If Kamala is the winner, we’re all toast, and we might as well resign ourselves to one-party rule and the loss of the republic.
Great post thank you
Hi, John.
A suitable addition to your critical thinking list for the upcoming elections is:
Dollars spent, per likely voter, by each party for races that either think are critical.
It is a frighteningly high value. One result is that most of the money is being spent, by far, in the swing states.
I also noticed that in one PAC list that all the candidates were receiving MUCH MORE money from out-of-state donors than from the actual voters in that state. I consider that to be a failure of our democratic system. We already provide equal weight to each voter, no matter the voter’s substantive knowledge, but we now have overwhelming weight being given to out-of-state non-voters/contributors.
I also have tried, but failed, to find out the set of sources that the federal government considers when it comes up with the numbers of dollars that it considers have been spent (or in holding) by each candidate. Can you address that? (For example, can it be claimed that the sum of any gifts from any Party that exceeds $100 is akin to an offered bribe? I personally don’t think so, but SOMETHING needs to be done. As another example, could any sums coming in from outside the State to within-State media require an equal allotment of that sum to the major opponent? That would really stop the faucet.)
I have written up some of this in the past, but I seem to get nothing by the reviewing editors.
You provide a great service, one that is appreciated.
Bill Lynch
John…I’m glad you got the bug fixed.
Your post on upcoming 2024 is a good inventory of our situation. Our situation took decades to create, and it is the fault of we likeminded citizens NOT PAYING ATTENTION over these decades thinking everything would be OK…not paying attention to schools indoctrinating instead of educating, not paying attention to our government representative’s actual performance, etc., etc. The most recent situation needs to be laid at the feet of the current leadership over the last four years. If we want to change the situation, we have to change the leadership.
John…you and I have disagreed on how to change the leadership…thru fair elections (your stance) vs. get out the vote (my stance). Obviously, both are needed but my position over the last year has been that we’re not going to get fair elections in time for the election…your post seems to concede this point. My wife and I have teamed up with TurningPoint Action to construct a free TeamMichigan App that is Michigan centric. It has over 275,000 names, addresses and phone numbers of likeminded voters across Michigan who rarely vote. We’ve put together hundreds of volunteers across Michigan to download the free App and knock on doors, make calls, send texts or send letters to urge theses disengaged voters to pay attention and change the current situation the old fashioned way…by voting…in the face of widespread cheating. Many states have experienced cheating and only lost by fairly narrow margins. Our strategy is to overwhelm the cheating by getting likeminded non-voters to vote. In 2020, over 1.3 million of these voters did not vote.
Respectfully, we have under 30 days to make an important decision if we want to change the situation or if we want to continue the situation…this decision is in our hands.
Very good article. Wondering if you have seen this article and would consider commenting on the issue it discusses.
https://open.substack.com/pub/omega4america/p/race-is-breaking-trump-ineligible?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=16bjug
Gary: TY for your support...The article you cite seems to list multiple issues — so not sure what issue you are referring to. My overall comment on the article is that it is somewhat over-the-top.
Hi John. I appreciate your posts.
I'm glad Gary posted that link. I was going to post an earlier article but they present the same issue. And yes, Jay does tend to be both passionate about his dislike of the election integrity firms and proud of the work his team has accomplished.
But his software is real and does what he claims. In the following 3 min video, Jay does a walk-thru of a small sample of the bad entries in Texas' voter rolls:
https://rumble.com/v4tfqsc-texas-voters-living-in-retail-warehouses.html.
Yes it is over-the-top, but because addressing the issue it explains is the best way we have to make this election reflect the true choice of LEGAL votes and is not getting proper attention, I think it is needed.
There is really one issue, which is that there is evidence that as many absentee ballots as necessary to swing this election can be voted by other than the actual voter they will be sent to. Because the addresses they will be sent to are not deliverable to the actual voter. All the discussion is to emphasize and explain and give examples.
I hope you see how important this issue is and amplify it on your platform. Thanks for your reply.
TY for these insights!