18 Comments

John -

Two additional points regarding your Covid - 19 articles:

Most importantly

1) The irreparable developmental damage to those newborns subjected to masked adults from birth to approximately age 2. I'm no expert but there is no doubt newborns' response to facial gestures is well documented with many studies confirming newborns' early development is greatly stimulated by visual facial interaction. That partial or total lack of facial interaction will never be overcome by those newborns.

2) Early in the Covid -19 cycle the CDC website, accurate or inaccurate, was a user friendly platform that could be easily navigated to follow the statistical data that was updated monthly. I specifically recall that about 9 months into the epidemic (roughly the fall of 2020) CDC altered their website and at that point locating the Covid-19 statistical data became a challenging task that became all but impossible to track by 2021. So much for transparency.

Jim Mulligan

Expand full comment
author

Jim: Yes, those are both good points. My list was intnded to be a sample of some of the more serious problems caused.

Expand full comment

Great work. I just have seen some of the work of Jack Kruse a sixty year old brain surgeon with a very inquisitive mind. He has gone to El Salvadore to talk to the president. Significant work showing how exposure to light is critical to good health. Is pushing decentralized health. Talked with JFK Jr over an hour. Larry Wilhelmsen

Expand full comment
author
Sep 4·edited Sep 4Author

Larry: I think you mean RFK, jr. I don't know Dr. Kruse, but he sounds interesting.

Expand full comment

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it true that if there were approved treatments such as ivermectin, then there could be no "emergency use authorization" of the mRNA treatments? Big Pharma had a lot to lose....

Expand full comment
author
Sep 3·edited Sep 3Author

Davey: Yes, if treatments like IVM were officially "Approved." However, we were advocating for a step lower than "Approved" which is an EUA. The FDA also refused the EUA option, which really showed their hand...

Expand full comment

John, excellent critical analysis of things having gone catastrophically wrong during the COVID-19 "era". Part of the problem seems to be emerging from those who apply critical thinking to the NanoTechnological aspects of COVID. A problem is that the nanoparticles are appartently coming at us from all directions. Not just COVID "shots". For example, studies have shown that they are in dental anesthetics as well as insulin. And what about blood? Do blood banks discriminate between those that have taken COVID shots and those who haven't. Recently, an D.O. in Texas has begun to claim via citing bonified, published research that Nicotine seems to be able to break up the Spike Protein generating facility built by the nanotechnology. Also apparently EDTA also helps break up the rubbery blood clots, formed by interaction with the nanoparticles. The D.O.'s name in Bryan Ardis. He has his own lab. Here's an interview from a day or two ago:

https://rumble.com/v5d84at-riccardo-bosi-and-dr-bryan-ardis-this-will-change-how-you-see-everything.html

And he also has a book on this an related topics, available from Amazon, just published:

https://www.amazon.com/Moving-Beyond-COVID-19-Bryan-Ardis/dp/1961641224/ref=sr_1_1

Expand full comment

John, thank you so much for this column. The great majority of the US public were trustingly led like cows to slaughter: (1) because of the enormous fear of the covid virus, (2) up to that point there was very little reason to question the CDC, and (3) because we all thought that every physician, including those who stood before the mics in the covid briefings, had done their scientific homework and would never mislead us with speculative advice. We citizens learned important, shocking, and sad lessons from those days. The harm done to our families and misplaced faith in our government is indelible and may never, if ever, be repaired.

Kathleen B.

Expand full comment
author

Kathleen: Yes, the combination of FEAR and TRUST was used against us. We can not allow that to go unexposed.

Expand full comment

Great analysis John. You hit it out of the park

Expand full comment
author

Paul: I appreciate your support.

Expand full comment

Great post!! 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment
author

Jeff: Thank you

Expand full comment

And there never will be! Now “Pfizer For All” Healthcare website is up and running. Why? Why is Pfizer now entering into the healthcare industry? Not only will they have FDA approval for anything they want approved, they’ll also, IMO, be the only go to for “Healthcare & Meds”!

Something is definitely going on here! I’m not in the know but I know when something is off.

AJR

Expand full comment

Well said and indeed they were, from our perspective. From the tyrannical-loving globalists, gun-grabbers, abortionists, censorship lovers, religion-haters, freedom destroying Nanny State dictators (like Newsom), it was sheer perfection. It terrifyingly proves that our government is further along the road to communism than we suspected.

Expand full comment
author

AS: Yes, it does say a lot about not only how things are, but how much we have tolerated. I thought that writing it down might help put things in perspective.

Expand full comment

Again, on target. Your series on the greater good is worth a repeat.

Expand full comment