I don’t have any magical powers, but sometimes the evidence is strong enough to warrant a prediction.
My 2¢ is that Kamala Harris will be put in the role of being President, prior to the 2024 elections. She will be told (by her handlers) not to do or say anything controversial, again prior to the 2024 elections. (After that all bets are off.)
Some members of the US voting public (e.g., non-critical thinkers) will then see her as: 1) Presidential, and 2) someone who isn’t as radical as her prior record indicates.
In other words it will significantly improve her chances to get elected in 2024.
Put another way, it is a strategical error for Republicans to be making a further issue of Biden not being qualified to be President (like this). We get it, so let it be!
KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PRIZE!
And remember the saying: Don’t go from the frying pan into the fire…
I hope that my prediction is wrong!
Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:
Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.
WiseEnergy.org: discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.
C19Science.info: covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.
Election-Integrity.info: multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.
Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time - but why would you?
Thanks for reading Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues! Please pass a link to this article on to other associates who might benefit. They can subscribe for FREE to receive new posts (typically about once a week).
terry_oldberg@yahoo.com (email)
A barrier to thinking critically that is known to few people but known to me is for a “complex” physical system to be mistaken for a “non-complex” physical system in the construction of a model of this physical system. A consequence from this mistake is for the Principles of Reasoning called “entropy minimax” to be falsified by the argument made by this model, where its “entropy” is the missing information in an inference to the outcome of a conditional event of the future for the physical system being modelled for a deductive conclusion to be reached by this inference, per event.
In the scientific research that he has conducted in the historical record, The statistician and clinical psychologist Mattias Desmet has discovered that for this mistake to be made a a large group of the citizens of a given country is a precursor to totalitarian rule over the people of this country. Desmet describes this research in the book that is titled “The Psychology of Totalitarianism”
I agree and agree. She’ll be put in and I hope I’m wrong.
But after seeing the brazen voting “irregularities” from 2020, coupled with many states changing the elections laws which will just enhance the “irregularities” witnessed last time, I think it’s a very probable outcome. I still remember some of the data analyses you did post 2020 election and I believe nothing was done to address those issues.