Share this comment
The underlying premise is that we are rapidly approaching a climate apocalypse because of fossil fuel use. It make s no difference to them that China, India, and developing countries are the major sources of emissions and their emissions are growing. If they were really concerned about cost-effectiveness they would support natural gas …
The underlying premise is that we are rapidly approaching a climate apocalypse because of fossil fuel use. It make s no difference to them that China, India, and developing countries are the major sources of emissions and their emissions are growing. If they were really concerned about cost-effectiveness they would support natural gas and nuclear. But that is not their agenda. Killing fossil fuel use is.
But actual, global data, most significantly global sea level rise records of the past 100+ years, do not support ANY significant global warming, and therefore, there OBVIOUSLY can't be such a thing as man-made climate change.
Their goal is control. Killing fossil fuels is just one of many ways to get there.