I was asked by a competent, actively involved energy person: “What needs to be done to fix our dismal national energy policies?”
After 40± years of working with this and other related issues, here are my brief overview comments about the causalities of our repeated technical policy failures:
1 - The number one deficiency with our energy policies is that they are written by lobbyists — for the benefit of their clients (e.g. NGOs and other special interests). Unfortunately, citizens have no lobbyists representing them, so any benefits of these policies to the public are accidental.
2 - Science exists to give us answers to technical problems. Energy issues are technical matters. As such energy policies should be thoroughly rooted in Science. However, our technical policies (e.g., energy, climate, COVID) are NOT based on real Science, but rather on political science — aka politics.
[Note such ideas as the "all-of-the-above" energy policy are concocted by lobbyists and are devoid of real Science — e.g., see here.]
3 - Ninety-nine percent of the public is technically challenged. Although the public strongly supports Science, they have almost no understanding of what Science actually is. Lobbyists and other bad actors know this, so they continually misrepresent what Science says about technical issues (energy, climate, COVID, etc.). Most citizens do not understand the difference between actual Science and political science, so they are easily fooled into thinking that our technical policies are based on real Science when they almost never are.
[Note: I put together a unique list of good books about energy matters. Publicizing these books would help in educating citizens.]
4 - Conservative organizations are the primary candidates to educate the public about the deceptions they are being fed on technical matters. However, for a variety of nonsensical reasons, Conservative organizations simply do not work well with each other or their allies. On the other hand, organizations on the Left work together much better, so Conservative organizations are continually out-maneuvered. The net effect of this is that America and its citizens are more and more harmed — which is exactly what is happening today (e.g., see here).
5 - Another major failing of Conservative organizations is that they are poor communicators. Even though they have winning messages, they repeatedly get outfoxed by their Left counterparts— who pay much more attention to terminology, messaging, etc. [For some examples of the latter, see here.]
6 - An extraordinary problem that is receiving almost zero meaningful attention by any Conservatives, is the nonsense being taught (and omitted) in Science classes in our K-12 education system. The net effect of the purposeful propagandizing of our children is that every year, 4± million misinformed graduates join the ranks of voting citizens. This is an unmitigated disaster, that MUST be fixed. I explain the problem (and solutions) in my recent Education Report.
So my short answer is that if we want better technical policies, we need to fix the above problems. What are YOU willing to do to help?
PS — the typical consequences of not basing technical policies on Science are:
1) the results are far less than promised,
2) the costs are much higher than expected, and 3) there are many unintended consequences — like a net loss of jobs.
Sound familiar?
Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:
WiseEnergy.org: discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.
C19Science.info: covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.
Election-Integrity.info: multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.
Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2023 Archives. Send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time - but why would you?)
Thanks for reading Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues! Subscribe for FREE to receive new posts (typically about once a week).
A government's energy policy is a subset of its policies. In making these policies, a government needs to have a model of each physical system that is to be regulated through the enactment of this policy into law. In building this model the builder of this model needs to have a solution to the so-called Problem of Induction. The problem is of how, in a logically permissible way, to select the set of inferences that are made by a model of a physical system from a larger set of possibilities. This problem is solved by the rule that the induced model expresses all of the available information but no more than this information. Details on implementation of this method are published in the seven volume Entropy Minimax Source Book by the late Ronald Christensen, circa 1980. However, this method is seldom used. Instead, a builder of a model of a physical system selects this set of inferences through use of the intuitive rules of thumb called "heuristics." However, on each occasion in which a particular heuristic selects a particular set of inferences for being made by the model, a different heuristic selects a different set of inferences for being made by this model. In this way, the Method of Heuristics falsifies Aristotle's Law of Non-Contradiction. Replacement of the Method of Heuristics by the rule that the induced model expresses all of this available information but no more solves the Problem of Induction and in this way provides a logically sound basis for public policy making. Usage of a logically unsound basis forr public policy making is he cause for Mass Formation Psychosis as described by Mattias Desmet in "The Psychology of Totalitarianism."
Please free to contact me for further details.
Cordially,
Terry Oldberg
Engineer/Scientist/Public Policy Researcher
Los Altos Hills, CA
1-650-941-0533
terry_oldberg@yahoo.com
A group of us here in Colorado Springs are working on putting together a cirriculum specifically addressing this . Contact us if you can offer support .